Experimental Psychology 7th Edition By Anne Myers – Test Bank
Test Questions
Multiple Choice
- (F) Introduction
Experimental designs in which each subject serves in more than one experimental condition are called - Â Â between-subjects designs.
- factorial designs.
c.  independent groups designs.
*                d.  within-subjects designs.
- (A) Introduction
Wally participated in an experiment in which he rated the taste of three different pale ales. This study used a ____ design.
a. between-subjects
b.  factorial
c.  independent groups
*                d.  within-subjects
- (C) Introduction
A between-subjects design may not be the best approach when
a. random assignment to conditions will control subject variables.
*                b.  subjects vary greatly on the dependent variable.
c.  there is asymmetrical carryover between treatment conditions.
d.  treatment conditions interfere with each other.
- (C) Introduction
When there are large individual differences in subject responses to treatment conditions, we should assess the effects of an independent variable using ____ designs.
a.  between-subjects - factorial
c.  independent groups
*                d.  within-subjects
- (C) Disadvantages of a Within-Subjects Design
The hypothetical study of car-buying preferences was based on the premise that the type of car people first learn to drive influences later purchasing decisions. This study could not use a within-subjects design because
a. it would be hopelessly confounded by order effects.
b.  researchers cannot manipulate the first car subjects learn to drive.
*                c.  subjects can only participate in one condition (compact or smaller car).
d.  there are large individual differences in car-buying preferences.
- (A) Disadvantages of a Within-Subjects Design
In Jenna’s within-subjects design, subjects learned the same list of words in two different treatment conditions (forming mental pictures of the words and repeating the words over and over). Her selection of a within-subjects design to compare learning strategies was unfortunate because a
a. between-subjects design would provide better control for individual
differences.
b.  between-subjects design would achieve greater statistical power.
*                c.  within-subjects design involves unavoidable interference between
experimental conditions.
d.  within-subjects design risks uncontrollable order effects.
- (F) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
Whenever changes in performance occur because a condition falls in different places in a series of treatments, there is confounding due to
a. carryover effects.
b.  interference effects. - maturation effects.
*                d.  order effects.
- (C) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
In which of these designs might confounding due to order effects be a problem?
a. between-subjects design
b.  matched groups design
*                c.  within-subjects design
d.  matched groups design and within-subjects design
- (C) Advantages of a Within-Subjects Design
A researcher has a better chance of detecting the effect of the independent variable using a within-subjects design because
a. each subject goes through each treatment condition more than once.
*                b.  each subject serves as his or her own control.
c.  the experimenter can more precisely manipulate the independent variable
than in a between-subjects design.
d.  the experimenter compares subjects against each other.
- (C) Disadvantages of a Within-Subjects Design
A within-subjects design is a poor choice when
*                a.  participation in one treatment condition will provide subjects too many
clues about the next conditions.
b.  subjects vary widely in performance on the dependent variable.
c.  there is a small number of subjects.
d.  we need to control extraneous subject variables.
- (A) Disadvantages of a Within-Subjects Design
A within-subjects design would be either impossible or useless for
a. estimating line length for different line orientations.
*                b.  learning the same list of words using different study strategies.
c.  studying driving simulator performance on separate days under different
blood alcohol levels.
d.  tracking a visual target using different computer displays.
- (F) Disadvantages of a Within-Subjects Design
You should not use a repeated-measures design when
*                a.  exposure to one level of an independent variable will affect performance
during subsequent treatment conditions.
b.  it is possible to perform the same study using a between-subjects design.
c.  the sample size is small.
d.  there are large individual differences in subject performance on the
dependent variable.
- (F) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
Block randomization controls
a. asymmetrical carryover effects.
b.  linear progressive error.
c.  nonlinear progressive error.
*                d.  linear and nonlinear progressive error.
- (C) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
If we wish to counterbalance treatments in a within-subjects design and present each treatment condition only once to each subject, we must use
*                a.  across-subjects counterbalancing.
b.  block randomization.
c.  reverse counterbalancing.
d.  subject-by-subject counterbalancing.
- (A) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
We will need a minimum of ___ subjects to use complete counterbalancing with three treatment conditions.
a. 2
b.  3
*                c.  6
d.  9
- (A) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
Chastity wants to use complete counterbalancing with four treatment conditions in a within-subjects design. How many subjects will she need?
a. 4
b.  8
c.  12
*                d.  24
- (A) Controlling Within-Subjects Designs
If an experimenter plans to use complete counterbalancing with five levels of an independent variable, she will need a minimum of ___ subjects.
a. 5
b.  15
c.  40
*Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â d. Â 120
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.